Ces radiol. 2010, 64(1):20-27

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of peripheral lymph nodes - radiologic-pathologic correlationOriginal article

Radka Jakubcová1, Mojmír Moulis2, David Šálek3, Jakub Foukal1
1 Radiologická klinika LF MU a FN, Brno
2 Ústav patologie LF MU a FN, Brno
3 Interní hematoonkologická klinika FN, Brno

Aim: On the basis of correlation of ultrasound and histological findings to determine changes in the structure of examined benign and malignant lymph nodes, that led to various types of enhancement in contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination.

Method: 78 patients with peripheral lymphadenopathy were examined from January 2008 to July 2009 (27 women and 51 men, age 22-86 years), total number of 82 lymph nodes were extirpated. All patients were examined with Philips iU22 ultrasound machine with 17MHz probe natively and with 9MHz probe after intravenous application of 1.5 ml sulphur hexafluoride contrast agent (SonoVue®, Bracco, Italy). According to postcontrast enhancement lymph nodes were divided into benign and malignant group. Lymph nodes were subsequently extirpated and examined histologically. Ultrasound and histological findings were correlated.

Results: The overall accuracy of the method was 92,7% for CEUS. In total 76 lymph nodes (92,7%) were correctly evaluated in terms of their benign or malignant changes. Five histologically benign lymph nodes (6,1%) were incorrectly identified as malignant ones. One malignant node was incorrectly classified as benign by CEUS. In most cases of malignant lymphadenopathy it was possible to distinguish between metastasis and lymphoproliferative disorder.

Conclusion: Various processes developing in the lymph node are also reflected in the macroscopic image of the node in contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination. Depending on the type of contrast agent distribution in the node, we can assess the maintenance or, on the contrary, disappearance of its normal structure in most cases, and thus to distinguish between benign and malignant process.

Keywords: sulphur hexafluoride, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, lymphadenopathy

Accepted: August 15, 2009; Published: March 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jakubcová R, Moulis M, Šálek D, Foukal J. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of peripheral lymph nodes - radiologic-pathologic correlation. Ces radiol. 2010;64(1):20-27.
Download citation

References

  1. Kolektiv autorů. Speciální patologie I. díl. Praha: Karolinum 2001; 63-70.
  2. Vomáčka J, Stárek I, Michálková K, Houserková D, Brož M. Ultrasonografická diagnostika cervikálních lymfadenopatií. Česká radiologie 1999; 53(2): 82-87.
  3. Vassallo P, Wernecke K, Roos N, Peters PE. Differentiation of benign from malignant superficial lymphadenopathy: the role of high-resolution US. Radiology 1992; 183(1): 215-220. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Tschammler A, Ott G, Schlang T, Seelbach-Goebel B, Schwager K, Hahn D. Lymphadenopathy: differentiation of benign from malignant disease - color Doppler US assessment of intranodal angioarchitecture. Radiology 1998; 208(1): 117-123. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Vomáčka J, Stárek I. Zkušenosti s využitím kontrastní látky v ultrasonografické diagnostice povrchových lymfadenopatií. Čes Radiol 1999; 53(Suppl 1): 61-64. Go to original source...
  6. Schade G. Experiences with using the ultrasound contrast medium levovist in differentiation of cervical lymphomas with color-coded duplex ultrasound. Laryngorhinootologie 2001; 80(4): 209-213. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Moritz JD, Ludwig A, Oestmann JW. Contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography for evaluation of enlarged cervical lymph nodes in head and neck tumours. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175(5): 1279-1284. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Jakubcová R, Foukal J, Budinská E, Šmardová L. Využití kontrastního ultrazvukového vyšetření v diferenciální diagnostice lymfadenopatií - první zkušenosti. Čes Radiol 2009; 63(1): 48-55.
  9. Plank L. Atlas biopsie nelymfómových lymfadenopatií. Martin: Osveta 1990; 97-100.
  10. Adam Z, Krejčí M, Vorlíček J, et al. Hematologie, přehled maligních hematologických nemocí 2. Praha: Grada Publishing 2008; 169-176.
  11. Lee AI, Lacasce AS. Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma. Oncologist 2009; 14(7): 739-751. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Tsai HK, Mauch PM. Nodular lymphocyte-predominant hodgkin lymphoma. Semin Radiat Oncol 2007; 17(3): 184-189. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Jørgensen JM, Sørensen FB, Bendix K, et al. Angiogenesis in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: clinico-pathological correlations and prognostic significance in specific subtypes. Leuk Lymphoma 2007; 48(3): 584-595. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Tzankov A, Heiss S, Ebner S, et al. Angiogenesis in nodal B cell lymphomas: a high throughput study. J Clin Pathol 2007; 60(5): 476-482. Epub 2006 Jun 21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Döme B, Hendrix MJ, Paku S, Tóvári J, Tímár J. Alternative vascularization mechanisms in cancer: Pathology and therapeutic implications. Am J Pathol 2007; 170(1): 1-15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.