Ces radiol. 2019, 73(4):250-255 | DOI: 10.55095/CesRadiol2019/038
Upper urinary tract dimensions on CT urography in adults and how they are affected by the hydration statusOriginal article
- 1 Lékařská fakulta UP, Olomouc
- 2 Radiologická klinika LF UP a FN, Olomouc
- 3 Ústav lékařské biofyziky LF UP, Olomouc
- 4 Urologická klinika LF UP a FN, Olomouc
Aim: Dilatation of the urinary tract is an important sign in the diagnosis of its obstruction. Unfortunately, there is a significant inter-individual variability in the size of the renal pelvis and ureter, furthermore, their size is influenced by other factors, e.g. hydration status. The aim of the work was to evaluate the effect of hydration on urinary tract diameters.
Methods: Totally 110 patients (77 men, 33 women, average age 65 years) with bilateral normal finding on the both kidneys met the inclusion criteria. The CT protocol included an unenhanced, corticomedular, nephrographic, and excretory phase. During the examination, 70 ml of contrast agent and 30 ml of saline were injected, followed by an intravenous infusion of 120 ml saline to promote diuresis. We measured the intra-renal and extra-renal anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the pelvis and the width of the abdominal ureter in an unenhanced phase (low hydration status) and in an excretory phase (high hydration status). We statistically compared the dimensions in the unenhanced and excretory phases and then we compared the values between the right and left side.
Results: The difference in intra- and extra-renal APD and abdominal ureter width in unenhanced and excretory phases was statistically significant on both sides: intra-renal APD on the right - median 5.55 mm (range 2-15.5 mm) vs. median 7.5 mm (range 2.7-17.2 mm); extra-renal APD on the right - median 7 mm (range 2-24.4 mm) vs. 9.15 mm (range 1.8-25.3 mm); intra-renal APD on the left - median 5.45 mm (range 1.6-16.7 mm) vs. median 6.6 mm (range 1.8-25.3 mm); extra-renal APD on the left - median 7.15 mm (range 1.7-18.6 mm) vs. median 8.55 mm (range 1.8-25.8 mm); the width of ureter on the right - median 3.83 mm (range 1.8-9.4 mm) vs. median 4.25 mm (range 2.05-9.25 mm); the width of ureter on the left - median 3.9 mm (range 1.55-7.9 mm) vs. 4.23 mm (range 1.55-9.65 mm), all comparisons on the significance level p < 0.001. Comparison of diameters between the left and right side revealed mean differences less than 0.8 mm in renal pelvis dimensions and less than 0.3 mm in ureters.
Conclusion: The diameters of the adult renal pelvis and ureter revealed great inter-individual variability and significant influence of hydration status. Lateral symmetry seems to be more reliable tool for the diagnosis of urinary tract obstruction, than urinary tract dimensions measurement.
Keywords: organism hydration status, multi-detector computed tomography, renal pelvis, upper urinary tract, ureter, urography
Grants and funding:
Práce byla podpořena vnitřním grantem Univerzity Palackého: IGA_LF_2019_002.
Accepted: November 15, 2019; Published: December 1, 2019 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Bakaj Zbrožková L, Michálková K, Čtvrtlík F. Ultrazvukové vyšetření ledvin a močového měchýře u dětí. Ces Radiol 2013; 67(4): 270-275.
- Chow JS, Koning JL, Back SJ, Nguyen HT, Phelps A, Darge K. Classification of pediatric urinary tract dilation: the new language. Pediatric Radiology 2017; 47(9): 1109-1115.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Nguyen HT, Benson CB, Bromley B, et al. Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). Journal of Pediatric Urology 2014; 10(6): 982-998.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Schaeffer AJ, Kurtz MP, Logvinenko T, et al. MRI-based reference range for the renal pelvis anterior-posterior diameter in children ages 0-19 years. British Journal of Radiology 2016; 89(1067): 20160211.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Rosenfield A, Taylor K, Dembner A, Jacobson P. Ultrasound of renal sinus: new observations. American Journal of Roentgenology 1979; 133(3): 441-448.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Ismaili K, Avni FE, Piepsz A, et al. Current management of infants with fetal renal pelvis dilation: A survey by French-speaking pediatric nephrologists and urologists. Pediatric Nephrology 2004; 19(9): 966-971.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Walker MR, Babikian S, Ernest AJ, et al. Sonographic evaluation of hydronephrosis in the pediatric population: Is well-tempered sonography necessary? Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2015; 34(4): 655-662.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Robinson JN, Tice K, Kolm P, Abuhamad AZ. Effect of maternal hydration on fetal renal pyelectasis. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 1998; 92(1): 137-141.
Go to original source...
- Meola M, Giuliano G, Morelli E, Cupisti A, Barsotti G. Ultrasound diagnosis of suspected urinary tract obstruction using a stimulated diuresis test. Nephron 1995; 71(2): 143-148.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Nicolau C, Vilana R, Del Amo M, et al. Accuracy of sonography with a hydration test in differentiating between excretory renal obstruction and renal sinus cysts. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound 2002; 30(9): 532-536.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Dietrich C, et al. Ultrasonografie, 5. přepracováné vydání. Košice: Equilibrium 2008; 223.
- Bowra J, et al. Emergency ultrasound made easy, 2nd edition. London: Churchill Livingstone 2011; 78.
- Kamaya A, et al. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Abdomen and Pelvis. Altona: Elsevier Health Sciences 2015; 44.
- Błaszczyk M, Cichocki P, Bieńkiewicz M, Dąbrowski J, Płachcińska A, Kuśmierek J. Assessment of the relation between pelvicalyceal dilatation in ultrasound and features of obstructive uropathy in dynamic renal scintigraphy. Nuclear Medicine Review 2018; 21(2): 96-99.
- Emamian SA, Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, Ytte L. Sonographic evaluation of renal appearance in 665 adult volunteers. Acta Radiologica 1993; 34(5): 482-485.
Go to original source...
- Potenta SE, D'Agostino R, Sternberg KM, Tatsumi K, Perusse K. CT urography for evaluation of the ureter. RadioGraphics 2015; 35(3): 709-726.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Zelenko N, Coll D, Rosenfeld AT, Smith RC. Normal ureter size on unenhanced helical CT. American Journal of Roentgenology 2004; 182(4): 1039-1041.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Brant W, et al. Fundamentals of diagnostic radiology, 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2007; 890.
- Moeller T, et al. Normal findings in CT and MRI. Stuttgart-NewYork: Thieme 2000; 39.
- Joffre F, et al. Radiological imaging of the ureter. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2003; 21-24.
Go to original source...
- Weill F, et al. Imaging of abdominal and pelvic anatomy. New York: Churchill Livingstone 1997; 284-278.
- Smith RC, Verga M, Dalrymple N, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs of helical unenhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167(5): 1109-1113.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Silverman SG, Akbar SA, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Bhagwat JG, Seifter JL. Multi-detector row CT urography of normal urinary collecting system: furosemide versus saline as adjunct to contrast medium. Radiology 2006; 240(3): 749-755.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.