Ces radiol. 2007, 61(4):392-399

Contribution of contrast-enhanced CT for detection of malignant etiology of pleural effusionOriginal article

Josef Novotný1, Pavel Eliáš1, Zdeněk Špriňar1, Petr Habal2, Vratislav Sedlák3
1 Radiodiagnostická klinika LF UK a FN, Hradec Králové
2 Kardiochirurgická klinika LF UK a FN, Hradec Králové
3 Plicní klinika LF UK a FN, Hradec Králové

Aim: The authors retrospectively analyze cohort of 137 patients presenting with pleural effusion of unknown etiology to assess the applicability of contrast-enhanced CT imaging for detection of malignant etiology.

Method: Over a period of 5 years we examined patients with pleural effusion of unknown etiology according to predesigned scanning protocol. All CT investigations were carried out on either of our two CT scanners (Somatom HiQ and Somatom Plus 4; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The first mentioned scanner was incremental, the second one was single helical. The examination started as a full length thorax CT without contrast injection followed by i.v. bolus enhancement according to predesigned protocol. There were 137 patients included in this study in whom the final diagnosis was confirmed, comprising 82 (60 %) males and 55 (40 %) females.

Results: In 82 patients (60 %) the final diagnosis of etiology of pleural effusion was malignant. The average age in malignant disease was 60.3 years and most often the malignancy occurred in the group of 61-70 years of age. More than half of malignant diagnoses was in men (57 %). Our focus was on detection of pleural changes indicating malignant etiology. Irregular thickening occurred in 58 patients. This represents 70.7 % of the malignant group. In 13 cases (15.9 %) there was no detectable opacification and in the remaining 11 cases (13.4 %) we detected regular pleural opacification. Malignant effusion was always exudative, in one case of lymphoma the character of effusion was chylothorax. Its density was not specific. The overall sensitivity of irregular (or nodular) pleural changes for detection of malignant pleural effusion reached in our study group 70.7 %, specificity was 96.4 %, positive predictive value was 96.7 % and negative predictive value was 68.8 %.

Conclusion: In cases of pleural effusion of unknown etiology the contrast-enhanced CT is a method which has the capacity to help significantly in discrimination of differential diagnoses. We assume that we were able to demonstrate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced CT in diagnostic algorithm when dealing with pleural effusion of unknown etiology. Our data show promising results of CT in this diagnostic effort however, we should always consider contrast-enhanced CT as one of complementing methods which has its limits.

Keywords: malignancy, pleural effusion, computed tomography

Accepted: August 15, 2007; Published: December 1, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Novotný J, Eliáš P, Špriňar Z, Habal P, Sedlák V. Contribution of contrast-enhanced CT for detection of malignant etiology of pleural effusion. Ces radiol. 2007;61(4):392-399.
Download citation

References

  1. Marel M, Zrůstová M, Šťastný B, Light RW. The incidence of pleural effusion in a well-defined region: epidemiologic study in central Bohemia. Chest 1993; 104: 1486-1489. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Leff A, Hopewell PC, Costello J. Pleural effusion from malignancy. Ann Intern Med 1978; 88: 532-537. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Storey DD, Dines DE, Coles DT. Pleural effusion. A diagnostic dilemma. JAMA 1976; 236: 2183-2186. Go to original source...
  4. Chernow B, Sahn SA. Carcinomatous involvement of the pleura: An analysis of 96 patients. Am J Med 1977; 63: 695-702. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Maffessanti M, Tommasi M, Pellegrini P. Computed tomography of free pleural effusion. Eur J Radiol 1987; 1987: 87-90.
  6. Aquino SL, Webb WR, Gushiken BJ. Pleural exudates and transudate: Diagnosis with contrast enhanced CT. Radiology 1994; 192: 803-808. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Leung AN, Müller NL, Miller RR. CT in differential diagnosis of diffuse pleural disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154: 487-492. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Arrenas-Jimenéz J, Alonso-Charterina S, Sánchez-Payá J, et al. Evaluation of CT findings for diagnosis of pleural effusion. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 681-690. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. O,Donovan PB, Eng P. Pleural changes in malignant pleural effusion: appearance on computed tomography. Cleve Clin J Med 1994; 61: 127-131. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Peto J, Decarli A, La Vecchia C, et al. The European mesothelioma epidemic. Br J Cancer 1999; 79: 666-672. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Rodriguez-Panadero F. Lung cancer and ipsilateral pleural effusion. Ann Oncol 1995; 6: 25-27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.