Ces radiol. 2011, 65(4):256-265

Detection and characterization of hepatocellular liver lesions by using MRI with hepatospecific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPAOriginal article

Milan Mrklovský1, Ľudovít Klzo2, Jan Žižka2
1 Radiologické centrum Multiscan, Pardubice
2 Radiologická klinika LF UK a FN, Hradec Králové

Aim: To prospectively evaluate the possibilities of detection and characterization of hepatocellular liver lesions by means of MRI using hepatospecific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Method: A total of 78 subjects (67 females, 11 males) with known arterial hypervascularized liver lesion (other than haemangioma) were examined on MRI with administration of liver specific contrast agent Primovist (Gd-EOB-DTPA, Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany). All studies were performed on General Electric Signa 1.5T system before and after Primovist contrast agent injection in arterial, portal venous, equilibrium phases, and at twenty minutes past injection. Size, signal, enhacement pattern, homogeneity, and presence of central scar were evaluated. Lesions with contrast agent accumulation in liver specific phase were considered to be of hepatocellular origin. Iso-/hyperintense lesion in liver specific phase was in non-cirrhotic liver considered to be focal nodular hyperplasia provided the features on precontrast and dynamic contrast studies were in keeping with this diagnosis. Lesion showing signal increase in liver specific phase, however to a lesser degree than normal non-cirrhotic liver parenchyma was considered to be adenoma. Lesion showing no enhacement in liver specific phase was diagnosed as metastasis.

Results: 101 focal nodular hyperplasias (in 67 subjects) were diagnosed. 14 adenomas (in 4 subjects with 1, 1, 4, and 8 lesions, respectively) were found; three subjects were available to MRI follow-up without progression (after 24, 42, and 17 months, respectively). A single lesion in non-cirrhotic liver was thought to be a hepatoma, less likely an adenoma (adenoma confirmed on biopsy). A single patient presented with tens of lesions due to liver adenomatosis (histologically verified). Two lesions in two patients with liver cirrhosis were diagnosed as hepatomas. Three oncological patients were diagnosed with liver metastases.

Conclusion: Administration of liver specific contrast agent Primovist (Gd-EOB-DTPA) improves specification of hepatocellular liver lesions, particularly in cases of focal nodular hyperplasia where non-invasive diagnosis can be made with high accuracy. Also, differentiation between hypervascularized metastases and lesions of hepatocellular origin is very beneficial.

Keywords: hepatocellular liver lesion, liver specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA, magnetic resonance imaging

Accepted: July 15, 2011; Published: December 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mrklovský M, Klzo Ľ, Žižka J. Detection and characterization of hepatocellular liver lesions by using MRI with hepatospecific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA. Ces radiol. 2011;65(4):256-265.
Download citation

References

  1. Horton KM, Bluemke DA, Hruban RH, et al. CT and MR imaging of benign hepatic and biliary tumors. Radiographics 1999;19(2): 431-451. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Grazioli L, Morana G, Kirchin MA, Schneider G. Accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging: prospective study. Radiology 2005; 236: 166-177. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Boulahdour H, Cherqui D, Charlotte F, et al. The hot spot hepatobiliary scan in focal nodular hyperplasia. J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 2105-2110.
  4. Ba-Ssalamah A, Schima W, Schmook MT, et al. Atypical focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: imaging features of nonspecific and liver-specific MR contrast agents. AJR 2002; 179: 1447-1456. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Grazioli L, Federle MP, Ichikawa T, et al. Liver adenomatosis: clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings in 15 patients. Radiology 2000; 216: 395-402. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Chung KY, Mayo-Smith WW, Saini S, et al. Hepatocellular adenoma: MR imaging features with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165(2): 303-308. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Lewin M, Handra-Luca A, Arrivé L, et al. Liver adenomatosis: classification of MR imaging features and comparison with pathologic findings. Radiology 2006; 241(2): 433-440; Epub 2006 Sep 11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Reimer P, Vosshenrich R. Detection and characterization of liver lesions using gadoxetic acid as a tissue-specific contrast agent. Biologics 2010; 4: 199-212. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Giovanoli O, Heim M, Terracciano L, et al. MRI of hepatic adenomatosis: initial observations with gadoxetic acid contrast agent in three patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190(5): W290-293. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Holland AE, Hecht EM, Hahn WY, et al. Importance of small (< or = 20-mm) enhancing lesions seen only during the hepatic arterial phase at MR imaging of the cirrhotic liver: evaluation and comparison with whole explanted liver. Radiology 2005; 237(3): 938-944. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Kim SH, Kim SH, Lee J, et al. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192(6): 1675-1681. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H, et al. Distinguishing hypervascular pseudolesions of the liver from hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2010; 256(1): 151-158. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Gandhi SN, Brown MA, Wong JG, et al. MR contrast agents for liver imaging: what, when, how. RadioGraphics 2006; 26: 1621-1636. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Paley MR, Mergo PJ, Torres GM, Ros PR. Characterization of focal hepatic lesions with ferumoxides-enhanced T2-weighted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175(1): 159-163. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Bluemke DA,Weber TM, Rubin D, et al. Hepatic MR Imaging with Ferumoxides: Multicenter Study of Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Injection Protocol Radiology, 2003; 228(2): 457-464. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Kwak HS, Lee JM, Kim YK, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of ferumoxides-enhanced and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic three-dimensional volume interpolated breath-hold MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2005; 15(1): 140-147. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Lim JH, Choi D, Cho SK, et al. Conspicuity of hepatocellular nodular lesions in cirrhotic livers at ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging: importance of Kupffer cell number. Radiology 2001; 220(3): 669-676. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Suzuki S, Iijima H, Moriyasu F, et al. Differential diagnosis of hepatic nodules using delayed parenchymal phase imaging of levovist contrast ultrasound: comparative study with SPIO-MRI. Hepatol Res 2004; 29(2): 122-126. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Raman SS, Lu DS, Chen SC, et al. Hepatic MR imaging using ferumoxides: prospective evaluation with surgical and intraoperative sonographic confirmation in 25 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 807-812. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Kim HJ, Kim KW, Byun JH, et al. Comparison of mangafodipir trisodium and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI for detection and characterization of hepatic metastases in colorectal cancer patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 1059-1066. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S, et al. Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 2009; 29(6): 1725-1748. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Petersein J, Spinazzi A, Giovagnoni A, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine in MR imaging of focal liver lesions: a multicenter phase III clinical study. Radiology 2000; 215: 727-736. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Oudkerk M, Torres CG, Song B, et al. Characterization of liver lesions with mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging: multicenter study comparing MR and dual-phase spiral CT. Radiology 2002; 223(2): 517-524. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Coffin CM, Diche T, Mahfouz A, et al. Benign and malignant hepatocellular tumors: evaluation of tumoral enhancement after mangafodipir trisodium injection on MR imaging. Eur Radiol 1999; 9(3): 444-449. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Grazioli L, Morana G, Federle MP, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia: morphological and functional information from MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine. Radiology 2001; 221: 731-739. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Žižka J, Klzo L, Ferda J, et. al. Dynamic and delayed contrast enhancement in upper abdominal MRI studies: comparison of gadoxetic acid and gadobutrol. Eur J Radiol 2007; 62(2): 186-191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Kühn JP, Hegenscheid K, Siegmund W, et al. Normal dynamic MRI enhancement patterns of the upper abdominal organs: gadoxetic acid compared with gadobutrol. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193(5): 1318-1323. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Huppertz A, Haraida S, Kraus A, et al. Enhancement of focal liver lesions at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histopathologic findings and spiral CT-initial observations. Radiology 2005; 234: 468-478. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Bluemke DA, Sahani D, Amendola M, et al. Efficacy and safety of MR imaging with liver-specific contrast agent: U.S. multicenter phase III study. Radiology 2005; 237(1): 89-98. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Tsuboyama T, Onishi H, Kim T, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: hepatocyte-selective enhancement at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging-correlation with expression of sinusoidal and canalicular transporters and bile accumulation. Radiology 2010; 255(3): 824-833. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Ungermann L, Eliás P, Zizka J, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia: spoke-wheel arterial pattern and other signs on dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol 2007; 63(2): 290-294. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Kitao A, Zen Y, Matsui O, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: signal intensity at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR Imaging-correlation with molecular transporters and histopathologic features. Radiology 2010; 256(3): 817-826. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Huppertz A, Balzer T, Blakeborough A, et al. Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings. Radiology 2004; 230: 266-275. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.