Ces radiol. 2014, 68(2):148-152

Reducing the radiation burden of angiographic performance using the ClarityIQ technologyOriginal article

Michal Rek1, Jakub Grepl1, Antonín Krajina1, Eva Čermáková2, Radovan Malý3, Vendelín Chovanec1, Ondřej Renc1, Jan Raupach1
1 Radiologická klinika LF UK a FN, Hradec Králové
2 Oddělení výpočetní techniky LF UK, Hradec Králové
3 1. interní kardioangiologická klinika LF UK a FN, Hradec Králové

Aim: Creation of a high-quality digital image system ClarityIQ on angiography equipment AlluraClarity Xper FD 20/20 (Philips Medical System, Best, The Netherlands) is associated with lower patient radiation burden than the previous generation of equipments. The aim of the study was to compare the effective doses of ionizing radiation on two angiographic intervention equipments Allura Xper FD 20 (Philips Medical System, Best, The Netherlands) and Philips Allura Xper FD Clarity 20/20 (Philips Medical System, Best, The Netherlands).

Methods: In this retrospective study we analyzed 100 interventional examinations consecutively performed in 100 patients from 1st July 2012, until 1st July 2013. Fifty patients (34 males, 16 females, mean age 64 years, average weight 79 kg and average height 170 cm) were examined using the angiography set Philips AlluraClarity FD 20/20 employing the ClarityIQ technology. Fifty patients (30 males, 20 females, mean age 64 years, average weight 78 kg and average height 170 cm) were examined using the Allura Xper FD 20 set that does not work with the ClarityIQ system. The groups were divided according to the type of intervention on the performance of subgroups comprising 10 interventional procedures on each of the machine: the creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), the implantation of abdominal stentgrafts for abdominal aortic aneurysm, neurointerventional procedures in patients after subarachnoideal hemorrhage from a cerebral aneurysm (SAH), neurointerventional treatment of the patients with ischemic stroke, patients with carotid artery stenting (CAS).
The generated subgroups are determined by calculating the values of effective doses. The statistical significance of the reduction in effective doses of patients examined on the device that is equipped with ClarityIQ was demonstrated by tests of statistical program NCSS 2007.

Results: Significant reduction of radiation burden to patients has been shown by significant decrease of effective doses in the ClarityIQ system. The effective dose decrease ranged from 50% to 70% and was proved to be statistically significant.

Conclusion: The ClarityIQ significantly reduces radiation dose to the patient associated with the performance of interventional radiology procedures, and therefore equipments with similar systems should be preferred.

Keywords: effective dose, interventional radiology, fluoroscopy

Accepted: April 16, 2014; Published: June 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Rek M, Grepl J, Krajina A, Čermáková E, Malý R, Chovanec V, et al.. Reducing the radiation burden of angiographic performance using the ClarityIQ technology. Ces radiol. 2014;68(2):148-152.
Download citation

References

  1. Söderman M, Holmin S, Andersson T, et al. Image noise reduction algorithm for digital subtraction angiography: clinical results. Radiology 2013; 269: 553-560. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Söderman M, Mauti M, Boon S, et al. Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients. Neuroradiology 2013; 55(11): 1365-1372. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Postupy pro stanovení a hodnocení dávek pacientů při lékařském ozáření programem PCXMC verze 2.0, Věstník Ministerstva zdravotnictví České republiky 2011, částka 9, kapitola 6.
  4. Cristy M, Eckerman KF. Specific absorbed fractions of energy at various ages from internal photon sources. I. Methods. Report ORNL/TM-8381/V1. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1987. Go to original source...
  5. Klener V, et al. Principy a praxe radiační ochrany. Praha: Azin CZ 2000.
  6. ICRP Publication 103. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann. ICRP 2007; 37: 2-4.
  7. IAEA Publication. Optimalization of the radiological protection of patients undergoing radiography, flouroscopy and computed tomography - IAEA 2004; 21-20.
  8. IAEA Publication. Patient Dose Optimalization in Flouroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures - IAEA 2010, 11-86.
  9. Green BMR, Hughes JS, Lomas PR, Janssens A. Natural Radiation Atlas of Europe Radiat Prot Dosimetry 1992; 45(1-4): 491-493. Go to original source...
  10. Interventional Electrotechnical Commission, Medical electrical equipment part 2-43: particular requirements for the safety of X-ray equipment part 2-43: particular requirements for the safety of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures, Report P-IEC 60601-2-43 ed. 1.0. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission 2010.
  11. Koenig TR, Wolff D, Mettler FA, Wagner LK. Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures. I. characteristics of radiation injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177(1): 3-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Miller DL, Balter S, Noonan PT, Georgia JD. Minimizing radiation-induced skin injury in interventional radiology procedures. Radiology 2002; 225(2): 329-336. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Geleijns J, Wondergem J. X-ray imaging and the skin: radiation biology, patient dosimetry and observed effects. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005; 114(1-3): 121-125. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Vano E, Gonzales L, Fernández JM, Haskal ZJ. Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution in warranted. Radiology 2008; 248(3): 945-953. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Ainsubry EA, Bouffler SD, Dörr W, et al. Radiation cataractogenesis: a review of recent studies. Radiat Res 2009; 172(1): 1-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Miller DL, Kwon D, Bonavia GH. Reference levels for patients radiation doses in interventional radiology: proposed initial values for U.S. Practice. Radiology 2009; 253(3): 753-764. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miler DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ. Fluoroscopically quided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair. Radiology 2010; 254(2): 326-341. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Nováková M, Cihlář F, Krajina A, Derner M. Návrh ověření standardních postupů pro optimalizaci lékařského ozáření při intervenční radiologii v oblasti tepen pánve a dolních končetin v České republice. Ces Radiol 2013; 67(2): 153-158.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.