Ces radiol. 2015, 69(1):9-19 | DOI: 10.55095/CesRadiol2015/001

Multiparametric imaging of the breast carcinoma on three-Tesla magnetic resonance using eghteen-channel breast coilReview article

Jiří Ferda1, Jan Kastner1, Radek Tupý1, Ilona Zedníková2, Andrea Ňaršanská2, Ondřej Hes3
1 Klinika zobrazovacích metod LF UK a FN, Plzeň
2 Chirurgická klinika LF UK a FN, Plzeň
3 Šiklův ústav patologické anatomie LF UK a FN, Plzeň

Aim: To evaluate the experience with breast tumors imaging on three-Tesla MRI using dedicated eighteen-channel breast coil and multiparametric assessment.

Method: The results of the 3T MRI were compared with those obtained by the histopathological evaluation of the resected breasts. The mean age of women was 51.8 y with the range 25 to 67 y. The imaging protocol included the morphological imaging, diffusion imaging, assessment of the dynamic enhancement of the tissue including pharmacodynamic analysis and the assessment of the choline content within the spectrum of the single-voxel MR spectroscopy.

Results: The sensitivity of 100% (18/18), specificity of 87.5% (7/8) was reached in detection of the malignant tumor. The highest particular sensitivity and specificity showed restriction of diffusion 88.9% (16/18) a 87.5% (7/8) followed by the spectroscopy - sensitivity 72.2% (13/18), specificity 87.5% (7/8). In the detection of the axillary lymph nodes metastases, the sensitivity both with specificity reached 83.3%.

Conclusion: The multiparametric evaluation of the breast 3T magnetic resonance is highly sensitive and relative highly specific method of the breast carcinoma detection, the sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of axillary lymph node sis also sufficient.

Keywords: breast carcinoma, 3T MRI, diffusion imaging, spectroscopy, multiparametric assessment
Grants and funding:

Podpořeno projektem Ministerstva zdravotnictví ČR Koncepční rozvoj výzkumné instituce 00669806 - FN Plzeň a Programem rozvoje vědních oborů Karlovy Univerzity (projekt P36) a grantem IGA 96-37.

Accepted: January 15, 2015; Published: March 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ferda J, Kastner J, Tupý R, Zedníková I, Ňaršanská A, Hes O. Multiparametric imaging of the breast carcinoma on three-Tesla magnetic resonance using eghteen-channel breast coil. Ces radiol. 2015;69(1):9-19. doi: 10.55095/CesRadiol2015/001.
Download citation

References

  1. Kuhl CK. Breast MR imaging at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007; 15(3): 315-320. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Lehotska V, Rauova K, Vanovcanova L. MR-mammography - impact on disease extent determination and surgical treatment of invasive ductal and lobular breast cancers. Neoplasma 2015 Jan 16. doi: 10.4149/neo_2015_032. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 25591592. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Al Rashidi N, Waiter G, Redpath T, Gilbert FJ. Assessment of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of normal breast tissue during the menstrual cycle at 3T using image segmentation. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81(Suppl 1): S1-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Cakir O, Arslan A, Inan N, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82(12): e801-806. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. De Felice C, Cipolla V, Guerrieri D, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient on 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and prognostic factors in breast cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2014; 35(4): 408-414.
  6. Cipolla V, Santucci D, Guerrieri D, et al. Correlation between 3T apparent diffusion coefficient values and grading of invasive breast carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83(12): 2144-2150. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Wisner DJ, Rogers N, Deshpande VS, et al. High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for the separation of benign from malignant BI-RADS 4/5 lesions found on breast MRI at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 40(3): 674-681. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Battal B, Akgun V, Karaman B. Value of 3T 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors. Acta Radiol 2014; 55(4): 416-417. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Gruber S, Debski BK, Pinker K, et al. Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging at 3 T for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Radiology 2011; 261(3): 752-761. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Le Y, Kipfer H, Majidi S, Holz S, Dale B, Geppert C, Kroeker R, Lin C. Application of time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories (TWIST)-Dixon in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 38(5): 1033-1042. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Lourenco AP, Donegan L, Khalil H, Mainiero MB. Improving outcomes of screening breast MRI with practice evolution: initial clinical experience with 3T compared to 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 39(3): 535-539; [Epub 2013 May 29] PubMed PMID: 23720144. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Rahbar H, DeMartini WB, Lee AY, et al. Accuracy of 3T versus 1.5T breast MRI for pre-operative assessment of extent of disease in newly diagnosed DCIS. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jan 8. pii: S0720-048X(15)00018-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.029. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 25604909. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Pinker K, Bogner W, Baltzer P, et al. Improved differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors with multiparametric 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20(13): 3540-3549. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Taneja S, Jena A, Goel R, Sarin R, Kaul S. Simultaneous whole-body 18F-FDG PET-MRI in primary staging of breast cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83(12): 2231-2239. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.