Ces radiol. 2015, 69(3):165-173 | DOI: 10.55095/CesRadiol2015/026

Evaluation of rectal carcinoma response to neoadjuvant treatment using multiparametric imaging on 3T MRI scannerOriginal article

Eva Korčáková1, Hynek Mírka1, Jan Kastner1, Petr Novák2, Tomáš Svoboda3, Ondřej Daum4
1 Klinika zobrazovacích metod LF UK a FN, Plzeň
2 Chirurgická klinika LF UK a FN, Plzeň
3 Onkologická a radioterapeutická klinika LF UK a FN, Plzeň
4 Šiklův patologicko-anatomický ústav LF UK, Plzeň

Aim: Evaluation of capability of multiparametric MR imaging (MRI) in the prediction and evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal carcinoma.


Metod: We performed a retrospective analysis of multiparametric MRI examinations on 3T scanner and histological findings in 22 patients before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In addition to the standard noncontrast and postcontrast MRI, the examinations included dynamic contrast-enhanced scans and diffusion-weighted images.

Results: The assessment of tumor staging using only noncontrast MRI and nondynamic postcontrast scans has a tendency to overestimate the extent of tumors in the group of neoadjuvant treatment responders. If we compared pharmakokinetic parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from the baseline MRI within the group of responders and nonresponders, we find significantly lower value for the parameter Ve in the group of responders (p = 0,013), differencies in all other parameters were nonsignificant. Comparison of the results of the baseline examination with examination after treatment separately in the group of responders and nonresponders, we found statistically significant changes in values ADC (p < 0,001), Ktrans (p < 0,001), Kep (p = 0,002) and iAUC (p = 0,048) in the group of responders. In the group of non-responders is a statistically significant difference only in the parameter Ve (p = 0,027).

Conclusion: From our research it is noticeable that although MRI is the most sensitive method for evaluation of the advanced stages of rectal cancer, is impossible to use it for prediction of the therapeutic effect in patients before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. It seems, that based of the comparison of results of pharmakokinetic analysis and ADC values from baseline and posttreatment MRI, it is possible to select patients with good response to the treatment, that can be candidates for less radical surgery or application of Watch and Wait protocol.

Keywords: rectal carcinoma, magnetics resonance imaging, neoadjuvant treatment, diffusion weighted imaging, pharmacokinetic analysis
Grants and funding:

Podpořeno projektem Ministerstva zdravotnictví ČR Koncepční rozvoj výzkumné instituce 00669806 - FN Plzeň a Programem rozvoje vědních oborů Karlovy Univerzity (projekt P36).

Accepted: September 9, 2015; Published: September 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Korčáková E, Mírka H, Kastner J, Novák P, Svoboda T, Daum O. Evaluation of rectal carcinoma response to neoadjuvant treatment using multiparametric imaging on 3T MRI scanner. Ces radiol. 2015;69(3):165-173. doi: 10.55095/CesRadiol2015/026.
Download citation

References

  1. Novák P, Třeška V. Chirurgická léčba časných a lokálně pokročilých karcinomů rekta. Kolorektální karcinom 2013. Farmakoterapie 2013; 9(speciální příloha).
  2. Ferko A. Karcinom rekta - současný pohled na kritéria radikality resekčních výkonů. Rozhl Chir 2013; 92: 295-296.
  3. Ibrahim D, Yang N, et al. Rectal cancer staging, Radiopaedia.org [online], 2005-2015. Dostupné na: http://radiopaedia.org/articles/rectal-cancer-staging-1
  4. Gollub MJ, Gultekin DH, Akin O, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced - MRI for the detection of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 821-831. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Lim JS, Kim D, Baek S, et al. Perfusion MRI for the prediction of treatment response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1693-1700. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Merkel S, Mansmann U, Papadopoulos T, et al. The Prognostic inho mogeneity of colorectal carcinomas stage III. Cancer 2001; 92(11): 2754-2759. Go to original source...
  7. Figueiras RG, Dominguez PC, et al. Prognostic factors and functional imaging in rectal cancer. Radiologia 2012; 54(1): 45-58. Go to original source...
  8. Beaumont C, Pandey T, Fricke G, et al. MR evaluation of rectal cancer: current concepts. Cur Probl Diagn Radiol 2013; 42: 99-112. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Pater UB, Blomqvist LK, Taylor F, George Ch, Guthrie A, et al. MRI after treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: how to report tumor response - the MERCURY experience. Am J Roentgenology 2012; 199: W486-W495. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Samee A, Selvasakar CHR. Current trends in staging rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(7): 828-834. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Bauerle T, Seyler L, Munter M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal carcinoma patients without and after chemoradiotherapy: a comparative study with histology. European J Radiol 2013; 82: 444-452. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Monguzzi L, Ippolito D, Bernasconi DP, et al. Locally advanced rectal cancer: value of ADC mapping in prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy. European J Radiol 2013; 82: 234-240. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Heo SH, Kim JW, Sang SS, Jeong YY, Kang HH. Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterology 2014; 20(15): 4244-4255. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Elmi A, Hedgire SS, Covarrubias D, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient as a non-invasive predictor of treatment response and recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer. Clinical Radiology 2013; 68: e524-e531. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Barbaro B, Vitale R, Valentini V, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in monitoring rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int Journal of Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 83: 594-599. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Kim SH, Lee JM, Gupta SN, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to evaluate the therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. J MR Imaging 2014; 40: 730-737. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. George ML, Dzik-Jurasz ASK, Padhani AR, et al. Non-invasive methods of assessing angiogenesis and their value in predicting response to treatment in colorectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery 2001; 88: 1628-1636. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Sun YS, Zang XP, Tang L, et al. Locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy: prelimitary analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for early detection of tumor histopathologic downstaging. Radiology 2010; 254: 170-178. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Figueras RG, Goh V, Padhani AR. The role of functional imaging in colorectal cancer. AJR 2010; 195: 54-66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Das P, Minsky BD. A Watch-and-wait approach to the management of rectal cancer. Oncology 2013; 27: 962-968.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.