Ces radiol. 2017, 71(4):291-295 | DOI: 10.55095/CesRadiol2017/040

Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilageReview article

Andrea Šprláková-Puková1, PetrVališ2, Marek Mechl1
1 Klinika radiologie a nukleární medicíny LF MU a FN, Brno
2 Ortopedická klinika LF MU a FN, Brno

The article presents a summary of current findings on magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage including basic and advanced sequences, their advantages and limitations. Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage is currently one of the hot topics. This is due to the increasing number of patients with cartilage lesions because of higher average active age on the one side and on the other side there are new possibilities of treating cartilage defects. An increasing number of different implants can be used for this treatment.

Keywords: hyalinne cartilage, magnetic resonance imaging, biochemical imaging
Grants and funding:

Podpořeno MZ ČR - RVO (FNBr, 16-30833A).

Accepted: November 15, 2017; Published: December 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šprláková-Puková A, PetrVališ, Mechl M. Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage. Ces radiol. 2017;71(4):291-295. doi: 10.55095/CesRadiol2017/040.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Lüllmann-Rauch R. Histologie. Praha: Grada Publishing 2012; 122-125. Go to original source...
    2. Kijowski R, Gold GE. Routine 3D magnetic resonance imaging of joints. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33: 758-771. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Wada Y, Watanabe A, Yamashita T, et al. Evalution of articular cartilage with 3D SPGR MRI after autologous chondrocyte implantation. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 2003; 8(4): 514-517. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Paunipagar BK, Rasalkar DD. Imaging of articular cartilage. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2014; 24(3): 237-248. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Podškubka A, Povýšil C, Kubeš R, et al. Ošetření hlubokých defektů chrupavky kolena transplantací autologních chondrocytů fixovaných na nosiči z esteru kyseliny hyaluronové (Hyalograft C). Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechosl 2006; 73: 251-263. Go to original source...
    6. Cameron ML, Briggs KK, Steadman JR. Reproducibility and reliability of the outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31(1): 83-86. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Reed ME, Villacis DC, Hatch GF, et al. 3.0-Tesla MRI and arthroscopy for assessment of knee articular cartilage lesions. Orthopedics 2013; 36(8): e1060-1064. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Gold GE, Chen ChA, Koo S, et al. Recent advances in MRI of articular cartilage. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193(3): 628-638. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Crema MD, Roemer FW, Marra MD, et al. Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research. RadioGraphics 2011; 31: 37-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Gold GE, Chen ChA, Koo S, et al. Recent advances in MRI of articular cartilage. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193(3): 628-638. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Hesper T, Hosalkar HS, Bittersohl D, et al. T2* mapping for articular cartilage assessment: principles, current applications, and future prospects. Skeletal Radiol 2014; 43(10): 1429-1445. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Chen Q, Zu Qo, Hu Q, et al. Morphological MRI and T2 mapping of cartilage repair tissue after mosaicoplasty with tissue-engineered cartilage in a pig model. The Journal of Biomedical Research 2014; 28: 309-319. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Tiel J, Bron EE, Tidelius CJ, et al. Reproducibility of 3D delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of the knee at 3.0 T in patients with early stage osteoarthritis. European Radiology 2013; 23(2): 496-504. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Guermazi A, Alizai H, Crema MD, et al. Compositional MRI techniques for evaluation of cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2015; 23: 1639-1653. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Wang YX, Zhang Q, Li X, et al. T1ρ magnetic resonance: basic physics principles and applications in knee and intervertebral disc imaging Quant Imaging Med Surg 2015; 5(6): 858-885.
    16. Jungmann PM, Baum T, Bauer JS, et al. Cartilage repair surgery: outcome evaluation by using noninvasive cartilage biomarkers based on quantitative MRI techniques? Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 840170. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Zbýň Š, Mlynárik V, Juras V, et al. Evaluation of cartilage repair and osteoarthritis with sodium MRI. NMR Biomed 2015; 29(2): 91-215. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Schleich C, Bittersohl B, Miese F, et al. Glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation transfer at 3T MRI in asymptomatic knee joints. Acta Radiol 2016; 57(5): 627-632. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Wei W, Lambach B, Jia G, et al. A phase I clinical trial of the knee to assess the correlation of gagCEST MRI, delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage and T2 mapping. Eur J Radiol 2017; 90: 220-224. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Štouračová A, Mechl M, Šprláková-Puková A, et al. Možnosti zobrazení artikulární chrupavky včetně volumometrických měření. Ces Radiol 2011; 65(1): 61-69.
    21. Campbell AB, Knopp MV, Kolovich GP, et al. Preoperative MRI underestimates articular cartilage defect size compared with findings at arthroscopic knee surgery. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2013; 41(3): 590-595. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content