Ces radiol. 2018, 72(3):188-195 | DOI: 10.55095/CesRadiol2018/027

Impact of partial volume effect, noise, and region of interest selection on aortic flow evaluation using phase contrast MRIOriginal article

Radek Galabov, Jaroslav Tintěra, Lucie Súkupová
Základna radiodiagnostiky a intervenční radiologie IKEM, Praha

Objective: Phase contrast sequence may be used to measure the flux of blood in vessels. The result might be, however, corrupted by many errors including partial volume effect (PVE), region of interest (ROI) contouring, and noise. In this study we aim to quantify the error and if possible to suggest a proper strategy to minimize it.

Methods: Water flux was measured using a plastic flow phantom and changing the flow rate and spatial resolution which affects the PVE error. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of magnitude images was used to estimate error caused by noise and a comparison to a statistical error from several measurements was made. Water flux in vitro and flux through aortal valve and sinotubular junction in vivo was also measured with undersized and oversized ROIs.

Results: The PVE subsides as spatial resolution improves and as the difference between magnitude signal from flowing and static tissue decreases. The error of flow through aortal valve was estimated to be 0.45%. Noise affects random error (estimation 0.05%) less then flow fluctuations (0.25%). The ROI size underestimation may lead to a severe underestimation of flow (over 10%) and a small underestimation in the case of aortal valve flow to a mild overestimation (5%). In general, an overestimation of ROI size is also erroneous (6%), although not as severe as underestimation.

Conclusion: The most relevant source of error out of the three sources examined is ROI contouring with overestimation being recommended over underestimation. The error resulting from the PVE is small compared to ROI contouring error. The error caused by noise is negligible compared to flow fluctuation.

Keywords: error, flow, magnetic resonance, phase contrast
Grants and funding:

Podpořeno z programového projektu Ministerstva zdravotnictví ČR s reg. č. 15-27178A.

Accepted: August 15, 2018; Published: September 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Galabov R, Tintěra J, Súkupová L. Impact of partial volume effect, noise, and region of interest selection on aortic flow evaluation using phase contrast MRI. Ces radiol. 2018;72(3):188-195. doi: 10.55095/CesRadiol2018/027.
Download citation

References

  1. Pleva M, Ouředníček P. MRI srdce: praktické využití z pohledu kardiologa. Praha: Grada Publishing 2012.
  2. Jiang J, Kokeny P, Ying W, et al. Quantifying errors in flow measurement using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of several boundary detection methods. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2015; 33(2): 185-193. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Wolf RL, Ehman RL, Riederer SJ, Rossman PJ. Analysis of systematic and random error in MR volumetric flow measurements. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1993; 30(1): 82-91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. MacRobbie DW. MRI: from picture to proton. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University 2008; 204.
  5. Heiberg E, Sjögren J, Ugander M, et al. Design and Validation of Segment - a Freely Available Software for Cardiovascular Image Analysis. BMC Medical Imaging 2010; 10: 1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.