Ces radiol. 2021, 75(2):177-183 | DOI: 10.55095/CesRadiol2021/022

Evaluation of results of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke according to the recommendations of international multi-society consensus: What is necessary to follow and can be the stated criteria fulfilled?Original article

Martin Kocher1, Daniel Šaňák2, Jana Zapletalová3, Marie Černá1, Tomáš Veverka2, Vojtěch Prášil1, Michal Král2, Tomáš Dorňák2, David Franc2, Petr Polidar2
1 Komplexní cerebrovaskulární centrum, Radiologická klinika LF UP a FN, Olomouc
2 Komplexní cerebrovaskulární centrum, Neurologická klinika LF UP a FN, Olomouc
3 Ústav lékařské biofyziky LF UP, Olomouc

Aim: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) of symptomatic occlusion of cerebral artery has become a standard treatment in acute ischemic stroke (IS) patients. Based on analysis of previously published results, the recommendations for the centers performing MT were introduced in the year 2018 and became accepted as indicators of quality of care. The aim of presented study was to evaluate if our center was able to follow the recommendations established by international multi-society consensus, and furthermore, to assess a trend of recommended indicators during the time using a comparison of our results between years 2016 and 2019.

Methods: All consecutive acute IS patients with large vessel occlusion both in anterior and posterior circulation treated in our center in the year 2019 were included in the analysis. All demographic and clinical data, as well as time parameters and treatment results were collected prospectively. Data were subsequently compared with recommended values of individual parameters of multi-society consensus. The results of the year 2019 were subsequently compared with those from the year 2016 to assess a trend in our center.

Results: In total, 152 patients (52% of males, mean age: 71.2 ± 13.2 years) were indicated to MR in our center in the year 2019. In 75% of patients indicated to MT, brain imaging was started within 23 min after patient's arrival to center, groin puncture was performed within 62 min after patient's arrival to center (primary transport), and in 70% of patients, recanalization was achieved within 34 min after groin puncture. Recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2b) was achieved in 133 (87.5%) patients a completed (mTICI 3) in 102 67.2%) patients. Eighty (52.6%) patients reached good 3-month clinical outcome (mRS 0-2). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after MT occurred in 5 (3.4%) patients.

Conclusion: Our results showed that it was possible fulfill the recommended values of parameters stated in the international multi-society consensus also in Czech Republic and thus, the can be recommended as indicators of quality of care.

Keywords: acute ischemic stroke, mechanical thrombectomy, indicators of quality of care, stent-retriever, aspiration
Grants and funding:

Práce byla podpořena grantem RVO FNOL_00098892_2020.
Supported by grant RVO FNOL_00098892_2020.

Accepted: May 30, 2021; Published: June 1, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kocher M, Šaňák D, Zapletalová J, Černá M, Veverka T, Prášil V, et al.. Evaluation of results of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke according to the recommendations of international multi-society consensus: What is necessary to follow and can be the stated criteria fulfilled? Ces radiol. 2021;75(2):177-183. doi: 10.55095/CesRadiol2021/022.
Download citation

References

  1. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, et al.; MR CLEAN Investigators. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372(1): 11-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 [Epub 2014 Dec 17]. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 2015; 372(4): 394. PMID: 25517348. Go to original source...
  2. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, et al.; ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372(11): 1019-1030. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 [Epub 2015 Feb 11]. PMID: 25671798. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, et al.; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372(24): 2296-2306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 [Epub 2015 Apr 17]. PMID: 25882510. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, et al.; SWIFT PRIME Investigators. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372(24): 2285-2295. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415061 [Epub 2015 Apr 17]. PMID: 25882376. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, et al.; EXTEND-IA Investigators. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015; 372(11): 1009-1018. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 [Epub 2015 Feb 11]. PMID: 25671797. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al.; HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016; 387(10029): 1723-1731. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X [Epub 2016 Feb 18]. PMID: 26898852. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, et al; HERMES Collaborators. Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. JAMA 2016; 316(12): 1279-1288. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647. PMID: 27673305. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Volny O, Krajina A, Belaskova S, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy performs similarly in real world practice: a 2016 nationwide study from the Czech Republic. J Neurointerv Surg 2018; 10(8): 741-745. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013534 [Epub 2017 Nov 16]. PMID: 29146830. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Köcher M, Šaňák D, Zapletalová J, et al. Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Czech Republic: Technical Results from the Year 2016. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41(12): 1901-1908. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-2068-z [Epub 2018 Aug 27]. PMID: 30151797. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Sacks D, Baxter B, Campbell BCV, et al. Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Int J Stroke 2018; 13(6): 612-632. doi: 10.1177/1747493018778713 [Epub 2018 May 22]. PMID: 29786478. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Eriksson N, et al. Multivariable analysis of outcome predictors and adjustment of main outcome results to baseline data profile in randomized controlled trials: safe implementation of thrombolysis in stroke-monitoring study (SITS-MOST). Stroke 2008; 39: 3316-3322. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.107.510768. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Šaňák D, Köcher M, Veverka, T et al. Acute combined revascularization in acute ischemic stroke with intracranial arterial occlusion: self-expanding solitaire stent during intravenous thrombolysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24(9): 1273-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.06.004. PMID: 23973019. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Sanak D, Kocher M, Veverka T, et al. The safety and efficacy of bridging full-dose IV-IA thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with MCA occlusion: a comparison with IV thrombolysis alone. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2014; 158(3): 391-396. doi: 10.5507/bp.2013.003 [Epub 2013 Feb 18]. PMID: 23446208. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Dorňák T, Herzig R, Kuliha M, et al. Endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: time to treatment is crucial. Clin Radiol 2015; 70(5): e20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.01.008 [Epub 2015 Feb 19]. PMID: 25703459. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Černík D, Šaňák D, Divišová P, et al. Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke on Anticoagulation Therapy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41(5): 706-711. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.