Ces radiol. 2021, 75(3):257-264 | DOI: 10.55095/CesRadiol2021/032

Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pelvic endometriosisOriginal article

Pavla Hanzlíková1,2, Jan Kumme1,3
1 Ústav radiodiagnostický FN, Ostrava
2 Ústav zobrazovacích metod OU. Ostrava
3 Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika FN, Ostrava-Poruba

The paper aims to present the current approach to implementing and evaluating magnetic resonance imaging in endometriosis. The authors give an overview of endometriosis forms.
They also deal with the imaging protocol concerning The Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) recommendation. The authors present the method of examination at the home workplace and experience in its implementation. The next part of the article presents a system for evaluating and scoring adenomyosis and endometriosis - especially DIE (deep infiltrating endometriosis), which is the most common reason for surgery.
The introduction of a system of examination and especially evaluation is a challenge for the future, not only for radiologists but also for other specialities; it is the basis for interdisciplinary cooperation with gynaecologists, urologists and surgeons. The exact language of communication between specialities should lead to consistent results, which will further help streamline the diagnostic process and optimize the following therapeutic approach.

Keywords: magnetic resonance, endometriosis, adenomyosis, ENZIAN

Accepted: September 15, 2021; Published: September 1, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hanzlíková P, Kumme J. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pelvic endometriosis. Ces radiol. 2021;75(3):257-264. doi: 10.55095/CesRadiol2021/032.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Luna Russo MA, Chalif JN, Falcone T. Clinical management of endometriosis. Minerva Gynecol 2020; 72(2): 106-118. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04544-X Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Fauconnier A, Chapron C. Endometriosis and pelvic pain: epidemiological evidence of the relationship and implications. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11(6): 595-606. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi029 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Falcone T, Flyckt R. Clinical Management of Endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131(3): 557-571. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002469 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Khan KN, Kitajima M, Fujishita A, Hiraki K, Matsumoto A, Nakashima M, Masuzaki H. Pelvic pain in women with ovarian endometrioma is mostly associated with coexisting peritoneal lesions. Hum Reprod 2013; 28(1): 109-118. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des364 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Chapron C, Santulli P, de Ziegler D, Noel JC, Anaf V, Streuli I, Foulot H, Souza C, Borghese B. Ovarian endometrioma: severe pelvic pain is associated with deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2012; 27(3): 702-711. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der462 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Bhosale PR, Javitt MC, Atri M, Harris RD, Kang SK, Meyer BJ, Pandharipande PV, Reinhold C, Salazar GM, Shipp TD, Simpson L, Sussman BL, Uyeda J, Wall DJ, Zelop CM, Glanc P. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Pelvic Pain in the Reproductive Age Group. Ultrasound Q 2016; 32(2): 108-115. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000200 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Chen YH, Wang DB, Guo CS. Accuracy of Physical Examination, Transvaginal Sonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Rectal Endoscopic Sonography for Preoperative Evaluation of Rectovaginal Endometriosis. Ultrasound Q 2019; 35(1): 54-60. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000428 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Bazot M, Daraï E. Diagnosis of deep endometriosis: clinical examination, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other techniques. Fertil Steril 2017; 108(6): 886-894. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.026 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Kobayashi H, Matsubara S, Imanaka S. Relationship between magnetic resonance imaging-based classification of adenomyosis and disease severity. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 47(7): 2251-2260. doi: 10.1111/jog.14803 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Tong A, VanBuren WM, Chamié L, Feldman M, Hindman N, Huang C, Jha P, Kilcoyne A, Laifer-Narin S, Nicola R, Poder L, Sakala M, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Taffel MT. Recommendations for MRI technique in the evaluation of pelvic endometriosis: consensus statement from the Society of Abdominal Radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45(6): 1569-1586. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02483-w Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Maciel C, Bharwani N, Kubik-Huch RA, Manganaro L, Otero-Garcia M, Nougaret S, Alt CD, Cunha TM, Forstner R. MRI of female genital tract congenital anomalies: European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. Eur Radiol 2020; 30(8): 4272-4283. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06750-8 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Moura APC, Ribeiro HSAA, Bernardo WM, Simões R, Torres US, D'Ippolito G, Bazot M, Ribeiro PAAG. Accuracy of transvaginal sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14(4): e0214842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214842 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Guerriero S, Saba L, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Rodriguez I, Mais V, Alcazar JL. Transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 51(5): 586-595. doi: 10.1002/uog.18961 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C, Kinkel K, Cunha TM, Guerra A, Manganaro L, Buñesch L, Kido A, Togashi K, Thomassin-Naggara I, Rockall AG. European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol 2017; 27(7): 2765-2775. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Scardapane A, Lorusso F, Scioscia M, Ferrante A, Stabile Ianora AA, Angelelli G. Standard high-resolution pelvic MRI vs. low-resolution pelvic MRI in the evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Eur Radiol 2014; 24(10): 2590-2596. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3297-4 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Schneider C, Oehmke F, Tinneberg HR, Krombach GA. MRI technique for the preoperative evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: current status and protocol recommendation. Clin Radiol 2016; 71(3): 179-194. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.09.014 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Bazot M, Stivalet A, Daraï E, Coudray C, Thomassin-Naggara I, Poncelet E. Comparison of 3D and 2D FSE T2-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis: preliminary results. Clin Radiol 2013; 68(1): 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.05.014 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. da Silva LLC, Torres US, Torres LR, Fong MS, Okuyama FH, Caiado AHM, Chamie LP, Moura APC, Novis MI, Warmbrand G, D'Ippolito G. Performance of imaging interpretation, intra- and inter-reader agreement for diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: comparison between an abbreviated and full MRI protocol. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03052-5 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Ha HK, Lim YT, Kim HS, Suh TS, Song HH, Kim SJ. Diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: fat-suppressed T1-weighted vs conventional MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163(1): 127-131. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.1.8010198 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Shetty AS, Sipe AL, Zulfiqar M, Tsai R, Raptis DA, Raptis CA, Bhalla S. In-Phase and Opposed-Phase Imaging: Applications of Chemical Shift and Magnetic Susceptibility in the Chest and Abdomen. Radiographics 2019; 39(1): 115-135. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180043 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Gadducci A, Zannoni GF. Endometriosis-associated Extraovarian Malignancies: A Challenging Question for the Clinician and the Pathologist. Anticancer Res 2020; 40(5): 2429-2438. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14212 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Robinson KA, Menias CO, Chen L, Schiappacasse G, Shaaban AM, Caserta MP, Elsayes KM, VanBuren WM, Bolan CW. Understanding malignant transformation of endometriosis: imaging features with pathologic correlation. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45(6): 1762-1775. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01914-7 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Cimsit C, Yoldemir T, Guclu M, Akpinar IN. Susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: preliminary results. Acta Radiol 2016; 57(7): 878-885. doi: 10.1177/0284185115602147 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    24. van den Bosch T, de Bruijn AM, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Huirne JAF. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53(5): 576-582. doi: 10.1002/uog.19096 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. Burla L, Scheiner D, Hötker AM, Meier A, Fink D, Boss A, Imesch P. Structured manual for MRI assessment of deep infiltrating endometriosis using the ENZIAN classification. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 303(3): 751-757. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05892-w Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Thomassin-Naggara I, Lamrabet S, Crestani A, Bekhouche A, Wahab CA, Kermarrec E, Touboul C, Daraï E. Magnetic resonance imaging classification of deep pelvic endometriosis: description and impact on surgical management. Hum Reprod 2020; 35(7): 1589-1600. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa103 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. di Paola V, Manfredi R, Castelli F, Negrelli R, Mehrabi S, Pozzi Mucelli R. Detection and localization of deep endometriosis by means of MRI and correlation with the ENZIAN score. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84(4): 568-574. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.017 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. Bean E, Chaggar P, Thanatsis N, Dooley W, Bottomley C, Jurkovic D. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of pelvic ultrasound for the detection and measurement of endometriotic lesions. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020(2): hoaa001. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa001 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Crestani A, Abdel Wahab C, Arfi A, Ploteau S, Kolanska K, Breban M, Bendifallah S, Ferrier C, Darai E. A short anogenital distance on MRI is a marker of endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2021; 2021(1): hoab003. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoab003 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Fan J, McDonnell R, Jacques A, Fender L, Lo G. MRI sliding sign: Using MRI to assess rectouterine mobility in pelvic endometriosis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13283 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content