Ces radiol. 2010, 64(4):301-306

Coronary CT angiography in patients with increased risk of ischemic heart disease - prospective study with 2 years follow-upOriginal article

Jan Baxa1, Jiří Ferda1, Miloslav Zikmund2, Jiří Kratochvíl3, Jan Pešek4, Boris Kreuzberg1
1 Klinika zobrazovacích metod LF UK a FN, Plzeň
2 Privátní kardiologická praxe, Smetanovy sady, Plzeň
3 II. Interní klinika LF UK a FN, Plzeň
4 I. Interní klinika LF UK a FN, Plzeň

Aim: To assess the value of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in asymptomatic patients with increased cardiovascular risk.


Material and method. 205 patients with increased cardiovascular risk (mean age 66.2 year) underwent CCTA using dual-source CT. Coronary findings were stratified as unimportant (up to 40% of narrowing), borderline (40-55%) and severe (55% and more). Using the odds ratio, the statistically important differences were tested between subgroup of diabetics and non-diabetics. All patients were under follow-up for two years.

Results: There were 26 patients (12.7%) having the severe stenosis of coronary artery, the coronary angioplasty was performed in five of them, coronary bypass graft surgery in two respectively. Two cases of newly developed unstable angina were noted in group of patients with initially severe stenosis. No myocardial infarction or sudden death was developed within the all group. The severe narrowing had statistically higher incidence in diabetics on the importance level of 5%.

Conclusion: In patients having the increased cardiovascular risk, the morbidity and mortality should be minimized when CCTA is used to test coronary arterial tree.

Keywords: coronary CT angiography, cardiovascular risk, ischemic heart disease
Grants and funding:

Práce byla podpořena výzkumným projektem MSM 0021620819.

Accepted: November 1, 2010; Published: December 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Baxa J, Ferda J, Zikmund M, Kratochvíl J, Pešek J, Kreuzberg B. Coronary CT angiography in patients with increased risk of ischemic heart disease - prospective study with 2 years follow-up. Ces radiol. 2010;64(4):301-306.
Download citation

References

  1. Nordhorn-Muller J, Binting S, Roll S, Willich S. An update on regional variation in cardiovascular mortality within Europe. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 1316-1326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Ardehali R, Nasir K, Kolandaivelu A, et al. Screening for subclinical atherosclerosis with non-contrast cardiac CT. Atherosclerosis 2007; 192: 235-242. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Simon A, Chironi G, Levenson J. Comparative performance of subclinical atherosclerosis tests in predicting coronary heart disease in asymptomatic individuals. Eur Heart J 2007; 28(24): 2967-2971. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Simon A, Levenson J. May subclinical arterial disease help to better detect and treat high-risk asymptomatic individuals? J Hypertens 2005; 23: 1939-1945. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Cooney MT, Dudina AL, Graham IM. Value and limitations of existing scores for the assessment of cardiovascular risk, a revue for clinicians. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1209-1227. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Chaowilt N, Arruda AL, McCully RB, Bailey KR, Pellikka PA. Dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with diabetes mellitus: enhanced prognostic prediction using a simple risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47(5): 1029-1036. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Perrone-Filardi P, Achenbach S, Möhlenkamp S, et al. Cardiac computed tomography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals without known cardiovascular disease: a position statement of the Working Group on Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2010; 14 [Epub]. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Choi EK, Choi SI, Rivera JJ, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography as a screening tool for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 357-365. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and nocalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast enhanced, submilimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2004; 109(1): 14-17. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Hadamitzky M, Preissmuth B, Meyer T, et al. Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2(4): 404-411. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli O, et al. Incremental prognostic value of multi-slice computed tomography angiography over coronary artery calcium scoring in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 2622-2629. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Alkadhi H, Leschka S. Radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography - what has been achieved and what needs to be done. Eur Radiol 2010; 19 [Epub]. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Sarwar A, Shaw LJ, Shapiro MD, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2: 675-688. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Raggi P, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of coronary calcium scoring in subjects with and without diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1663-1669. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Budoff MJ, Gul KM. Expert review on coronary calcium. A Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008; 4(2): 315-324. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Bax JJ, Young LH, Frye RL, et al. Screening for coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes. Diabetes care 2007; 30: 2729-2736. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Zellweger MJ. Prognostic significance of silent coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes. Herz 2006; 31: 240-245. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Van Werkhoven J, Cademartiri F, Seitun S, et al. Diabetes: prognostic value of CT coronary angiography - comparison with a nondiabetic population. Radiology 2010; 256 (1): 83-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Nathan DM, Meigs J, Singer DE. The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: how sweet it is… or is it? Lancet 1997; 350(1): 14-19. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Aldrovandi A, Maffei E, Palumbo A, et al. Prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 24-month follow-up study. Eur Radiol 2009; 19(7): 1653-1660. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.