Ces radiol. 2017, 71(3):216-225 | DOI: 10.55095/CesRadiol2017/030

Volumetric analysis of liver before and after portal vein embolization - our experienceOriginal article

Monika Staňková1, Vendula Trunčíková2, Tomáš Andrašina1, Jakub Hustý1, Vlastimil Válek1
1 Klinika radiologie a nukleární medicíny LF MU a FN Brno
2 Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity

Aim: To evaluate the increase in the future liver remnant (FLR) in patients prior to liver resection who underwent portal vein embolization, regarding applied embolization material. Another aim is to evaluate the interobserver variability of volumetric analysis for the measurement of volumes.

Methods: The total of 36 patients prior planned liver resection who underwent portal vein embolization in the University Hospital Brno were included in this retrospective study. Volumetric analysis was performed on CT/MRI before and after the procedure by two independent radiologists. The interobserver variability was determined by using Pearson and Wilcoxon correlation coefficient. The correlation between the increase in FLR and applied embolization material was determined by using pair t-test, as well as for the determination of correlation between the increase in FLR and recanalization of v. portae.

Results: The portal vein embolization was successful in all the patients with average increase in FLR by 4% for S2+3, by 8% for left liver lobe. Recanalization of v.portae occurred in 18 patients. The volume of S2+3 increased in average by 30%, the volume of left lobe by 30%. Major increase in FLR was proved using the permanent embolization agents (p = 0.014), the influence of recanalization was not proved (p = 0.056). Volumetric analysis shows to be a method of assessment with a very low interobserver variability; the Pearson correlation coefficient is > 0.9 (p < 0.001) for all the parameters.

Conclusion: In case of insufficient value of FLR before liver resection, it is possible to increase it with the portal vein embolization. The permanent embolization agents appear to be eligible. The volumetric analysis can be used for the determination of FLR, since it is a method with significantly low interobserver variability.

Keywords: FLR, hemihepatectomy, portal vein embolization, volumetric analysis
Grants and funding:

Práce vznikla v rámci projektu MUNI/A/1083/2015 Grantové agentury MU.

Accepted: September 15, 2017; Published: September 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Staňková M, Trunčíková V, Andrašina T, Hustý J, Válek V. Volumetric analysis of liver before and after portal vein embolization - our experience. Ces radiol. 2017;71(3):216-225. doi: 10.55095/CesRadiol2017/030.
Download citation

References

  1. Choti MA, Sitzmann JV, Tiburi MF, et al. Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 759-766. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN, Ellis LM, et al. Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 818-825. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, Ribero D, et al. Chemotherapy regimen predicts steatohepatitis and an increase in 90-day mortality after surgery for hepatic colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 2065-2072. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Pawlik TM, Scoggins CR, Zorzi D, et al. Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 715-722. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Charnsangavej C, Clary B, Fong Y, et al. Selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13: 1261-1268. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Ribero D, Curley SA, Imamura H, et al. Selection for resection of hepatocellular carcinoma and surgical strategy: indications for resection, evaluation of liver function, portal vein embolization, and resection. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 986-992. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Zorzi D, Laurent A, Pawlik TM, et al. Chemotherapy-associated hepatotoxicity and surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 2007; 94(3): 274-286. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Azoulay D, Castaing D, Smail A, et al. Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after percutaneous portal vein embolization. Ann Surg 2000; 231(4): 480-486. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Abdalla EK, Adam R, Bilchik AJ, et al. Improving resectability of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensusstatement. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13: 1271-1280. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Wicherts DA, Miller R, de Haas RJ, et al. Long-term results of two-stage hepatectomy for irresectable colorectal cancer for liver metastases. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 994-1005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. van Lienden KP, van den Esschert JW, de Graaf W, et al. Portal vein embolization before liver resection: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36(1): 25-34. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Denys A, Prior J, Bize P, et al. Portal vein embolization: what do we know? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35(5): 999-1008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Peregrin JH, Kováč J, Kautznerová D, et al. Embolizace portální žíly poly(2-hydroxyethylmethakrylátem) před rozsáhlou hepatektomií. Ces Radiol 2014; 68(2): 113-119.
  14. Denys A, Bize P, Demartines N, et al. Quality improvement for portal vein embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 33: 452-456. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Karlo C, Reiner CS, Stolzmann P, et al. CT- and MRI-based volumetry of resected liver specimen: comparison to intraoperative volume and weight measurements and calculation of conversion factors. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 107-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Schindl MJ, Redhead DN, Fearon KC, et al. The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection. Gut 2005; 54: 289-296. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Rau HG, Schauer R, Helmberger T, et al. Impact of virtual reality imaging on hepatic liver tumor resection: calculation of risk. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2000; 385: 162-170. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Válek V, Kala Z, Kiss I, et al. Maligní ložiskové procesy jater. Praha: Grada Publishing 2006; 244-245.
  19. Yoon JH, Lee JM, Jun JH, et al. Feasibility of three-dimensional virtual surgical planning in living liver donors. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40(3): 510-520. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Lodewick TM, Arnoldussen CWKP, Lahaye MJ, et al. Fast and accurate liver volumetry prior to hepatectomy. HPB 2016; 18(9): 764-772. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Gotra A, Chartrand G, Massicotte-Tisluck K, et al. Validation of a semiautomated liver segmentation method using CT for accurate volumetry. Acad Radiol 2015; 22(9): 1088-1098. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. van der Vorst JR, van Dam RM, van Stiphout RS, et al. Virtual liver resection and volumetric analysis of the future liver remnant using open source image processing software. World J Surg 2010; 34(10): 2426-2433. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Lubner MG, Dustin Pooler B, del Rio AM, Durkee B, Pickhardt PJ. Volumetric evaluation of hepatic tumors: multi-vendor, multi-reader liver phantom study. Abdom Imaging 2014; 39(3): 488-496. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Ribero D, Abdalla EK, Madoff DC, et al. Portal vein embolization before major hepatectomy and its effects on regeneration, resectability and outcome. Br J Surg 2007; 94(11): 1386-1394. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Martel G, Cieslak KP, Huang R, et al. Comparison of techniques for volumetric analysis of the future liver remnant: implications for major hepatic resections. HPB 2015; 17(12): 1051-1057. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Cheung TT, Ng KK, Chok KS, et al. Combined resection and radiofrequency ablation for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: prognosis and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(24): 3056-3062. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Feng K, Ma KS. Value of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(20): 5987-5998. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Loffroy R, Favelier S, Chevallier O, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization in liver cancer: indications, techniques and outcomes. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2015; 5(5): 730-739.
  29. Kakizawa H, Toyota N, Arihiro K, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization with a mixture of gelatin sponge and iodized oil: efficacy and safety. Acta Radiol 2006; 47: 1022-1028. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. de Baere T, Roche A, Elias D, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for extension of hepatectomy indications. Hepatology 1996; 24: 1386-1391. Go to original source...
  31. Teo JY, Allen, JC Jr., Ng DC, et al. A systematic review of contralateral liver lobe hypertrophy after unilobar selective internal radiation therapy with Y90. HPB 2016; 18(1): 7-12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.