Ces radiol. 2011, 65(3):177-182

Comparison of the filtered back projection reconstruction algorithm and the iterative reconstruction algorithm (IRIS)Original article

Petra Kozubíková1, Martin Horák2
1 Oddělení lékařské fyziky Nemocnice Na Homolce, Praha
2 Radiodiagnostické oddělení Nemocnice Na Homolce, Praha

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the possibilities of IRIS (Iterative reconstruction in Image Space) algorithm in noise reduction and potential dose reduction.

Method: A total of 85 patients clinically underwent CT examination (chest, abdomen, brain) with IRIS reconstruction and similar groups of 95 patients with Filtered Back Projection (FBP) reconstruction were evaluated. The reference tube current product in original CT protocols was modified for IRIS algorithm according to the subjective image quality. Two reconstruction algorithms were compared in terms of image noise, signal to noise ratio and effective dose.

Results: It was demonstrated that with the novel approach the mean effective dose reduction up to 50% for CT examination of the abdomen did not lead to image quality degradation. However, to retain the quality of CT images of the brain it was accomplished mean effective dose reduction only of 23%.

Conclusion: For this reason such measurements and similar optimization should precede to introduction of any new reconstruction algorithm into clinical routine.

Keywords: FBP, IRIS, iterative reconstruction, filtered back projection, CT, effective dose

Accepted: July 15, 2011; Published: September 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kozubíková P, Horák M. Comparison of the filtered back projection reconstruction algorithm and the iterative reconstruction algorithm (IRIS). Ces radiol. 2011;65(3):177-182.
Download citation

References

  1. Bittencourt MS, Schmidt B, Seltmann M, et al. Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010 (online) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9756-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Pontana F, Duhamel A, Flohr T, et al. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 627-635. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Pontana F, Duhamel A, Flohr T, et al. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 636-643. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Leipsic J, Heilbron BG, Hague C. Iterative reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: fading its way. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011 (online) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9832-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. AAPM REPORT NO. 96, The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT. (online) (cit. 2011-05-10). Dostupný z: http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/rpt_96.pdf
  6. Alkadhi H, Leschka S. Radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography - what has been achieved and chat Leeds to be done. Eur Radiolol 2011; 21: 505-509. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.