Ces radiol. 2013, 67(1):62-72

18F-FDG PET and PET/CT examinations in early diagnosis of giant cell arteritis - a cohort of 39 patientsOriginal article

Zdeněk Řehák1, Zdeněk Fojtík2, Petr Szturz2, Zbyněk Bortlíček3, Jana Eremiášová1, Jaroslav Staníček1, Karol Bolčák1, Petr Opletal4, Renata Koukalová1, Iva Neveselá1, Jiří Vašina1, Jiří Prášek5, Iva Kielkowská6, Petr Němec7
1 Oddělení nukleární medicíny MOÚ, Brno
2 Interní hematologická a onkologická klinika LF MU a FN, Brno
3 Institut biostatistiky a analýz MU, Brno
4 Oddělení radiologie MOÚ, Brno
5 Klinika nukleární medicíny LF MU a FN, Brno
6 Interní klinika FN, Ostrava
7 II. interní klinika FN U sv. Anny v Brně

Giant cell arteritis is classified among large-vessel vasculitis. Its first manifestation may be a febrile state with elevation in inflammation markers (ESR, CRP) and for examinations of such patients it is possible to use PET (PET/CT) scanning.

Aim: To verify if high FDG uptake in the walls of large vessels is corresponding with giant cell arteritis.

Method: Based on PET (25 pts) and PET/CT (14 pts) examinations, 39 patients with suspicion of large-vessel vasculitis formed a cohort in which were 30 males and 9 females aged 45-81 with a mean age of 64.9 and median of 65 years. For verifying, a direct proof using histologic examination of a vessel excision (4 pts) or an indirect one - a therapeutic test for ESR and CRP decreases during corticotherapy in immunosuppressive doses (39 pts) were opted. FDG uptake was measured in 7 vessel areas with an area evaluated as positive when it surpassed an uptake of the liver parenchyma. As a control group a sample of 100 patients free from vasculitis was used. For comparison, results from further imaging examinations were used.

Results: Giant cell arteritis was proved in 3 from 4 histologic examinations. By indirect testing, vasculitis in all 39 patients was confirmed. In patients with vasculitis before the use of corticotherapy, positivity of at least 3 vessel areas was found, whereas in the control group positivity was observed in 0-2 vessel areas. Further imaging examinations did not detect clear symptoms of vasculitis, it could be evaluated as abnormal.

Conclusion: The finding of generalized high FDG uptake in large vessels in patients with symptoms of active inflammatory disease gave evidence for large-vessel vasculitis. The PET (PET/CT) examinations detected the disease in its early phase and also determined the extent thereof. Direct imaging of afflicted temporal vessels was successful only by using a hybrid PET/CT scanner.

Keywords: giant cell arteritis, temporal arteritis, large vessel vasculitis, fever of unknown origin, PET, PET/CT
Grants and funding:

Práce byla financována z institucionální podpory výzkumné organizace poskytnuté Ministerstvem zdravotnictví ČR v roce 2012.

Accepted: June 12, 2012; Published: March 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Řehák Z, Fojtík Z, Szturz P, Bortlíček Z, Eremiášová J, Staníček J, et al.. 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT examinations in early diagnosis of giant cell arteritis - a cohort of 39 patients. Ces radiol. 2013;67(1):62-72.
Download citation

References

  1. Jennete JC, Falk RJ, Andrassy K, et al. Nomenclature of systemic vasculitides: Proposal of an international consensus conference. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37: 187-192. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Nesher G, Nesjet R. Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica, chapter 24 In Ball GV, Bridges SL. Vasculitis second edition. Oxford: University Press 2008: 305-322.
  3. Němec P, Jurečka, T, Žampachová V, Mašková Z, Souček M. Obrovskobuněčná arteriitida manifestující se oboustrannou arteriitickou přední ischemickou neuropatií zrakového nervu (AION). Vnitř. Lék. 2008; 54(123A): 1195-1205.
  4. Pavelka K. Polymyalgia rheumatica a temporální arteriitida. Čes Revmatol 2001; 9: 129-136.
  5. Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33(8): 1122-1128. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Hellmann DB. Immunopathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of giant cell arteritis, temporal arteritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and Takayasu's arteritis. Curr Op Rheum 1993; 5: 25-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Gravanis MB. Giant cell arteritis and Takayasu aortitis: Morphologic, pathogenetic and etiologic factors. Int J Cardiol 2000; 75(S): 21-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Pless M, Rizzo JF 3rd, Lamin JC, et al. Concordance of bilateral temporal artery biopsy in giant cell arteritis. J Neuroopthalmol 2000; 20: 213-215. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Ciancio G, Brushi M, Govoni M. Ultrasonography in diagnosis and follow-up of temporal arteritis: an update. In: Challenges in Rheumatology (ed. M. Harjacek). Rijeka: InTech: 2009; 129-142.
  10. Schmidt WA, Blockmans D. Use of ultrasonography and positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and assessment of large-vessel vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2004; 17: 9-15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Ferda J. CT angiografie. Praha: Galén 2004; 114.
  12. Bley TA, Wieben O, Uhl M, et al. High-resolution MRI in giant cell arteritis: imaging of the wall of the superficial temporal artery. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184(1): 283-287. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Pipitone N, Versari A, Salvarani C. Role of imaging studies in the diagnosis and follow-up of large vesel vasculitis: an update. Rheumatology 2008; 47: 403-408. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Rovenský J, Štvrtinová V, Blažíčková S, Štvrtina S. Polymyalgia rheumatica a obrovskobunková arteritída - od etiopetogenézy k liečbe. Via pract 2006; (10): 455-460.
  15. Chuang T-Y, Hunder GG, Ilstrup DM, Kurland LT. Polymyalgia rheumatica: a 10-year epidemiologic and clinical study. Ann Intern Med 1982; 97: 672-680. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Gebest HJ. Revmatologie. In Schettler G. Repetitorium praktického lékaře. Praha: Galén 1995; 967.
  17. Jones JG, Hazleman BL. The prognosis and management polymyalgia rheumatica. Ann Rheum Dis 1981; 40: 1-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Bird HA, Leeb BF, Monte Montecucco CM, et al. A comparison of the sensitivity of diagnostic criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 65: 626-629. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Řehák Z, Fryšáková L, Tichý T, Fojtík Z. Detekce temporální arteritidy pomocí 18F-FDG PET. Ces Radiol 2006; 60(4): 234-238.
  20. Blockmans D, Maes A, Stroobants S, et al. New arguments for a vasculitic nature of polymyalgia rheumatica using positron emission tomography. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999; 38: 444-447. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Turlakow A, Yeung HWD, Pui J, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 1003-1007. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Jarůšková M, Bělohlávek O. Role of FDG-PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis of prolonged fibrile states. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006; 33: 913-918. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Bleeker-Rovers CP, de Kleijn EM, Corstens FH, van der Meer JW, Oyen WJ. Clinical value of FDG PET in patients with fever of unknown origin and patients suspected of focal infection or inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004; 31: 29-37. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Blockmans D, Knockaert D, Maes A, et al. Clinical value of (18F)fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for patients with fever of unknown origin. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32: 191-196. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Ferdová E, Záhlava J, Ferda J. Horečky nejasného původu, význam hybridního zobrazení 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Ces Radiol 2008; 62(1): 23-33.
  26. Vallabhajosula S, Machac J, Knesaurek K. Imaging atherosclerotic macrophage density by Positron Emission Tomography using 18-fluorodeoxyglycose (FDG). J Nucl Med 1996; 37: 38.
  27. Chang ChY, Cheng ChY, Shih WJ. Applications of FDG PET/CT in Atherosclerosis and its Potential for Monitoring Therapeutic Responses. J Med Sci 2009; 29: 107-117.
  28. Johnston PW, Kennedy PT, Blair PH. Periaortitis complicating chronic aortic dissection Eur Heart J 2007; 28(4): 442. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Salvarani C, Pipitone N, Versari A, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET): Evaluation of Chronic Periaortitis. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 298-303. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Sakamoto A, Okamoto K, Ishizaka N, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in case of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Int Heart J 2006; 47: 645-650. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Němec P, Řehák Z, Fabián P, Souček M. Využití pozitronové emisní tomografie (18F-FDG PET) v diagnostice chronických periaortitid. Vnitř. Lék. 2008; 54(11): 1093-1099.
  32. Brodmann M, Lipp RW, Passath A, et al. The role of 2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis of the temporal arteries. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43(2): 241-242. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Belhocine T. The right place of 18FDG PET for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis - a response to the article of Brodmann et al. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43(5): 675-676. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Belhocine T, Blockmans D, Hustinx R, Vandevivere J, Mortelmans L. Imaging of large vessel vasculitis with 18FDG PET illlusion or reality? A critical revuve of literature data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 1305-1315. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Gaemperli O, Boyle JJ, Rimoldi OE, Mason JC, Camici PG. Molecular Imaging of vascular Inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37: 1236. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Kissin EY, Merkel P. Diagnostic Imaging in Takayasu arteritis. Curr Op Rheum 2004; 16(1): 31-37. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Andrews J, Nahhas A, Pennel DJ, et al. Non-invasive imaging in the diagnosis and management of Takayasu's arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 995-1000. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Walter MA, Mezer RA, Schindler C, et al. The value of (18)F-FDG-PET in the diagnosis of large vesel vasculitis and the assesement of aktivity and extent of disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005; 32: 674-681. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Moosig F, Czech N, Mehl C, et al. Correlation between 18-fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in large vessels and serological markers of inflammation in polymyalgia rheumatica: a quantitative PET study. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 870-873. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Meller J, Strutz F, Siefker U, et al. Early diagnosis and follow-up of aortitis with 18-FDG PET and MRI. Eur J Nucl Med 2003; 30: 730-736. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Blockmans D, De Ceuninck L, Vanderschueren S, et al. Repetitive 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis: a prospective study in 35 patients. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55(1): 131-137. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Scheel AK, Meller R, Vosshenrich R, et al. Diagnosis and follow up of aortitis in the elderly. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 1507-1510. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.