Ces radiol. 2021, 75(4):289-294 | DOI: 10.55095/CesRadiol2021/036

Variablity of the left vertebral artery - accidental autopsy finding and prevalence arch in the populationOriginal article

Lada Eberlová1,3, Hynek Mírka2,3, Petr Hošek3, David Škarda1, David Štěpánek1,4
1 Ústav anatomie LF UK, Plzeň
2 Klinika zobrazovacích metod LF UK a FN, Plzeň
3 Biomedicínské centrum LF UK a FN, Plzeň
4 Neurochirurgická klinika LF UK a FN, Plzeň

Aim: Based on an accidental autopsy case, the prevalence of similar findings in patients hospitalized at the University Hospital in Pilsen was evaluated.

Methods: In a cohort of 570 patients (228 females, 342 males; age 26-87 years), the prevalence and type of atypical branching of the aortic arch (AO) were evaluated with the use of CT angiography. An accidental finding in the donor body within the anatomical autopsy was assessed.

Results: All the aortic arches were left. Of the 30 findings (corresponds to a prevalence of 5.3%), the most frequently found configuration was the left vertebral artery arising between the left common carotid artery and the left subclavian artery, which also corresponded to the autopsy finding. In patients with atypical AO, the vertebral artery (VA) entered the foramen transversarium (FT) most often at the level of C5 on the left (73.3%) and C6 on the right (73.3%). Depending on sex, we significantly higher variability in the course of right VA was found in men. In women, the right VA pierced FT C6 most often. The left VA entered predominantly the FT of C5 in both sexes.

Conclusions: Atypical branching of the aortic arch was found in 5.3%, and was often accompanied with an atypical course of the vertebral arteries. In these patients, the left VA most often entered FT C5, on the right in women it entered exclusively C6. Therefore, in men with anomalous aortic arch or atypia of the left VA, it is necessary to take into account a considerable variability in the course of the right VA as well.

Keywords: aortic arch anomaly, aberant vertebral artery, foramen transversarium
Grants and funding:

Práce vznikla za finanční podpory Specifického výzkumu UK č. 260535.

Accepted: December 15, 2021; Published: December 1, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Eberlová L, Mírka H, Hošek P, Škarda D, Štěpánek D. Variablity of the left vertebral artery - accidental autopsy finding and prevalence arch in the population. Ces radiol. 2021;75(4):289-294. doi: 10.55095/CesRadiol2021/036.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Standring S. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 41st ed. China: Elsevier Limited 2016; 458(a), 600(b).
    2. Tubbs RS, Shoja MM, Loukas M. Bergman's Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variation. John Wiley & Sons 2016; 487(a), 506-508(b). Go to original source...
    3. Mikšík L, Lisý J, Polášková P, et al. Anatomie hlubokých krčních prostorů. Ces Radiol 2014; 68(3): 195-200.
    4. Jinkins JR. Atlas of Neuroradiologic Embryology, Anatomy, and Variants. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2000; 277(a), 330(b).
    5. Yuan S-M. Aberrant Origin of Vertebral Artery and its Clinical Implications. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 31(1): 52-59. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Sadler TW. Langmanova lékařská embryologie. Praha: Grada Publishing 2011; 210-214.
    7. Yamaki K, Saga T, Hirata T. Anatomical study of the vertebral artery in Japanese adults. Anat Sci Int 2006; 81(2): 100-106. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Zibis A, Mitrousias V, Galanakis N, et al. Variations of transverse foramina in cervical vertebrae: what happens to the vertebral artery? Eur Spine J 2018; 27(6): 1278-1285. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate Is Better than "Exact" for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions. Am Stat 1998; 52(2): 119-126. Go to original source...
    10. Giuffrè R, Sherkat S. The vertebral artery: developmental pathology. J Neurosurg Sci 1999; 43(3): 175-189.
    11. Bordes SJ, Iwanaga J, Zarrintan S, et al. Accessory Vertebral Artery: An Embryological Review With Translation from Adachi. Cureus 2021; 13(2): e13448. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13448. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Gailloud P. Vertebral artery triplication. Surg Radiol Anat SRA 2019; 41(7): 841-843. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Polguj M, Podgórski M, Jędrzejewski K, Topol M, Majos A. Fenestration and duplication of the vertebral artery: the anatomical and clinical points of view. Clin Anat N Y N 2013; 26(8): 933-943. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Ozpinar A, Magill ST, Davies JM, et al. Vertebral Artery Fenestration. Cureus 2015; 7(1): e245. doi: 10.7759/cureus.245 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Sim E, Vaccaro AR, Berzlanovich A, et al. Fenestration of the extracranial vertebral artery: review of the literature. Spine 2001; 26(6): E139-142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content