Ces radiol. 2025, 79(2):98-103 | DOI: 10.55095/CesRadiol2025/014

Navigation of portal vein puncture during TIPS using abdominal ultrasonographyOriginal article

Antonín Krajina1, 3, Štěpán Šembera2, 3, Vendelín Chovanec1, 3, Miroslav Lojík1, Zdeněk Bělobrádek1, Ondřej Renc1, 3, Jan Mašek1, 3, David Brustman1, Michal Rek1, Tomáš Fejfar2, 3, Petr Hůlek2, 3, David Zítko1, Marcel Homolka1, Pavel Ryška1, 3, Jan Raupach1, 3
1 Radiologická klinika LF UK a FN, Hradec Králové
2 II. interní gastroenterologická klinika LF UK a FN, Hradec Králové
3 Univerzita Karlova, Lékařská fakulta v Hradci Králové Korespondenční adresa:

Aim: In our retrospective study, we compared the efficacy of portal vein puncture navigation using abdominal ultrasonography versus CO2 portography. We assessed navigation efficiency according to the number of punctures required to achieve vena portae branch catheterization, the length of the fluoroscopy, and the dose area product (DAP).

Method: The study included 102 consecutive patients who underwent TIPS over a 3-year period (from the beginning of 2022 to the end of 2024). In this cohort, there were 29 women (28%) and 73 men (72%), ranging in age from 27 to 81 years. The main indications for TIPS were refractory ascites in 52 patients (51%) and bleeding with portal hypertension in 50 patients (49%). TIPS was performed as an emergency procedure in 19 patients (18.6%) for uncontrolled variceal bleeding. Child Pugh A, Child Pugh B and Child Pugh C were 22%, 44% and 26% respectively, with 8% of patients having no detectable classification.

Results: Of the 102 TIPS procedures, TIPS was not inserted in 3 patients due to technical failure (2.9%). The number of punctures required to reach the portal vein with guidewire insertion averaged 5.6 (range 1 to 20) in 50 patients whose puncture was guided by CO2 portography. In the 28 procedures where ultrasound was used for guidance, the mean number of punctures required was 2.7 (range, 1 to 6). The mean duration of fluoroscopy was 28 min (9-50 min) in the 28 procedures performed with CO2 guidance and 22.8 min (8-43 min) in the 28 procedures with ultrasound guidance. In the group of 19 procedures before angiomachine exchange and with CO2 navigation, the mean DAP was 181 497 mGy/cm2 (27 649-399 657 mGy/cm2), in the group of 17 procedures after angiomachine exchange and navigated by CO2 portography, the DAP averaged 159 339 mGy/cm2 (52 613-309 440 mGy/cm2) and in the youngest group of 21 procedures navigated by ultrasound, the DAP averaged 120 731 mGy/cm2 (38 180-315 121 mGy/cm2). Dose measurements with personal dosimeters were performed for 7 procedures. In the part of the procedure until the insertion of the guidewire into the portal vein, the operator had a dose of 6 µSv (0 to 12 µSv) on average, while the physician performing the ultrasound navigation had a dose of 4.4 µSv (0 to 9 µSv) on average. The total dose to the operator averaged 19.5 µSv (8 to 35 µSv).

Conclusion: From the measured values it can be concluded that the number of punctures during navigation with US decreased from 5.6 to 2.7 on average, this result is close to statistic significance (p = 0.052). The fluoroscopic time during the procedure decreased by 7 minutes. However, the dose of the second physician navigating the puncture using ultrasound is comparable to that of the main operator. The DAP decreased after the device upgrade, and even more decreased for procedures performed with ultrasound-guided puncture navigation.

Keywords: portal hypertension, TIPS, puncture navigation, radiation dose.

Accepted: February 20, 2025; Published: June 6, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Krajina A, Šembera Š, Chovanec V, Lojík M, Bělobrádek Z, Renc O, et al.. Navigation of portal vein puncture during TIPS using abdominal ultrasonography. Ces radiol. 2025;79(2):98-103. doi: 10.55095/CesRadiol2025/014.
Download citation

References

  1. Farsad K, Kaufman JA. Novel image guidance techniques for portal vein targeting during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016; 19(1): 10-20. doi:10.1053/j.tvir.2016.01.002 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Partovi S, Li X, Shwaiki O, et al. Advanced portal venous access techniques for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement. BMJ Open Gastro. 2021; 8: e000815. doi:10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000815 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Krajina A, Lojik M, Chovanec V, Raupach J, Hulek P. Wedged hepatic venography for targeting the portal vein during TIPS: comparison of carbon dioxide and iodinated contrast agents. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002; 25(3): 171-175. doi:10.1007/s00270-001-0096-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Gaba RC, Lakhoo J. What constitutes liver failure after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation? A proposed definition and grading system. Ann Hepatol. 2016; 15(2): 230-235. doi:10.5604/16652681.1193719 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Feinggumloon S, Haber Z, Saab S, Kaldas F, Eghbalieh N, Luong TT, McWilliams JP, Lee EW. Clinical impact and safety of non-target punctures (NTP) during portal vein access in TIPS procedure. Biomedicines 2023; 11: 1630. doi: org/10.3390/ biomedicines11061630 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Miraglia R, Maruzzelli L, Cortis K, D'Amico M, Floridia G, et. al. Radiation exposure in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016; 39(2): 210-217. doi:10.1007/s00270-015-1164-6 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Cannataci Ch, Cimo B, Mamone G, Tuzzolino F, D'Amico, M, Cortis K, et. al. Portal vein puncture-related complications during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: Colapinto needle set vs Rösch-Uchida needle set. Radiol Med. 2021; 126: 1487-1495. doi:10.1007/s11547-021-01404-1 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Rek M, Grepl J, Krajina A, Čermáková E, Malý R, Chovanec V, Renc O, Raupach J. Snížení radiační zátěže při angiografických výkonech s využitím systému Clarity IQ. Ces Radiol. 2014; 68(2): 148-152.
  9. Krajina A, Hulek P, Ferko A, Nozicka J. Extrahepatic portal venous laceration in TIPS treated with stent graft placement. Hepatogastroenterology 1997; 44(15): 667-670. PMID: 9222668.
  10. Kwak DH, Ramaswamy RS, Harrod M, Dunca JR. Analyzing radiation use during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020; 31(12): 2089-2097. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2020.05.004 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Gipson MG, Smith MT, Durham JD, Brown A, Johnson T, Ray CE, Jr, et. al. Intravascular US-guided portal vein access: Improved procedural metrics during TIPS creation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016; 27(8): 1140-1147. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.002 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Kao SD, Morshedi MM, Narsinh KH, Kinney TB, Minocha J, Picel AC, et. al. Intravascular ultrasound in the creation of transhepatic portosystemic shunts reduces needle passes, radiation dose, and procedure time: A retrospective study of a single-institution experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016; 27(8): 1148-1153. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2016.01.137 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Pillai AK, Andring B, Faulconer N, Reis SP, Xi Y, Iyamu I, et. al. Utility of intravascular US-guided portal vein access during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: Retrospective comparison with conventional technique in 109 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016; 27(8): 1154-1159. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2016.05.010 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Gupta VF, Agassi A, Martin JG, Cline BC, Kim CY, Ronald J. Intravascular ultrasound guidance for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation reduces laboratory markers of acute liver injury. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023; 34(10): 1680-1689: e2. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2023.06.034 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Lee EW, Shahrouki P, Saab S, Kaldas F, Eghbalieh N, McWilliams J, Ding P-X, Kee ST. Single puncture TIPS - A 3D fusion image-guided transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): An experimental study. Applied Sciences 2022; 12(10): 5267. doi.org/10.3390/app12105267. Go to original source...
  16. Nadjiri J, Waggershauser T, Mühlmann M, et. al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation (TIPS) in the angioCT - a hybrid intervention with image fusion. Eur Radiology 2023; 33: 7380-7387. doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09793-8 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Steffen DA, Najafi A, Binkert CA. Safety of percutaneous transmesenteric and transsplenic access for portosystemic shunt creation in patients with portal vein obstruction: Single-center experience and review of literature. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023; 46: 1401-1406. doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03484-0 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Maimaitiaishan T, Wang X, Chen X, et al. Technical note on modified direct intrahepatic portocaval shunt targeting different vessels for portal vein obstruction in cirrhosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025; 48: 102-107. doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03932-5 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Sanín E, Suarez-Galvis M, Álvarez S, Santamaría A. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation in children weighing < 10 kg using an unconventional technique. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2023; 34(6): 1070-1074. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2023.01.037 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Saad N, Darcy M, Saad W. Portal anatomic variants relevant to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008; 11(4): 203-207. doi:10.1053/j.tvir.2009.04.008 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Sureka B, Patidar Y, Bansal K, Rajesh S, Agrawal N, Arora A. Portal vein variations in 1000 patients: surgical and radiological importance. British J Radiology 2015; 88: 1055: 20150326. doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150326 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Masek J, Fejfar T, Frankova S, Husova L, Krajina A, Renc O, Chovanec V, Raupach J. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in liver transplant recipients: Outcomes in six adult patients. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2023; 57(4): 373-378. doi:10.1177/15385744221149907 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Lucatelli P, Krajina A, Loffroy R, et al. CIRSE Standards of Practice on transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024; 47: 1710-1726. doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03866-y Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.